Re: [HACKERS] Replication status in logical replication

On 4/10/18 6:14 AM, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 5:37 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 2:16 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>> On 16 January 2018 at 06:21, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 10:40:43AM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 12:43 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 9 January 2018 at 04:36, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>> We're not talking about standbys, so the message is incorrect.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ah, I understood. How about "\"%s\" has now caught up with upstream
>>>>> server"?
>>>>
>>>> +1.
>>>
>>> upstream is what I would have suggested, so +1 here also.
>>>
>>> Will commit.
>>
>> ping?
>>
>
> Should I add this item to "Older Bugs" of the open item since we
> regarded it as a bug?

I'm going to reclassify this as a bug since everyone seems to agree it
is one.

Simon, are you still planning to commit this?

Thanks,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net