Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays

From: Mark Rofail <markm(dot)rofail(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Hans-Jürgen Schönig <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays
Date: 2018-04-10 14:10:57
Message-ID: CAJvoCutzj34v_xfVtpQXNMEyYd8n13LSg2WCzHWhTqQhnB4ZzA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 3:59 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
wrote:
>
> documentation to it and a few extensive tests to ensure it works well);

I think the existing regression tests verify that the patch works as
expectations, correct?

We need more *exhaustive* tests to test performance, not functionality.

Regards

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Steele 2018-04-10 14:11:43 Re: [HACKERS] Replication status in logical replication
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2018-04-10 14:10:26 Re: Faster inserts with mostly-monotonically increasing values