| From: | Tatsuro Yamada <tatsuro(dot)yamada(dot)tf(at)nttcom(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: progress report for ANALYZE |
| Date: | 2019-11-26 03:56:48 |
| Message-ID: | d942639d-f54b-d58a-2dce-50bee22509cf@nttcom.co.jp_1 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Amit-san,
> Related to the above,
> I wonder whether we need the total number of ext stats on
> pg_stat_progress_analyze or not. As you might know, there is the same
> counter on pg_stat_progress_vacuum and pg_stat_progress_cluster.
> For example, index_vacuum_count and index_rebuild_count.
> Would it be added to the total number column to these views? :)
Oops, I made a mistake. :(
What I'd like to say was:
Would it be better to add the total number column to these views? :)
Thanks,
Tatsuro Yamada
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Justin Pryzby | 2019-11-26 04:21:24 | Re: checkpointer: PANIC: could not fsync file: No such file or directory |
| Previous Message | Etsuro Fujita | 2019-11-26 03:37:11 | Re: Problem while updating a foreign table pointing to a partitioned table on foreign server |