Re: progress report for ANALYZE

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tatsuro Yamada <tatsuro(dot)yamada(dot)tf(at)nttcom(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: progress report for ANALYZE
Date: 2019-11-26 12:22:51
Message-ID: 20191126122251.GA2848@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019-Nov-26, Tatsuro Yamada wrote:

> > I wonder whether we need the total number of ext stats on
> > pg_stat_progress_analyze or not. As you might know, there is the same
> > counter on pg_stat_progress_vacuum and pg_stat_progress_cluster.
> > For example, index_vacuum_count and index_rebuild_count.
> Would it be better to add the total number column to these views? :)

Yeah, I think it would be good to add that.

Álvaro Herrera
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2019-11-26 12:34:47 Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum
Previous Message Ranier Vilela 2019-11-26 12:13:16 [PATCH] Remove twice assignment with var pageop (nbtree.c).