Re: pg_stat_have_stats() returns true for dropped indexes (or for index creation transaction rolled back)

From: "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_stat_have_stats() returns true for dropped indexes (or for index creation transaction rolled back)
Date: 2022-09-26 08:23:30
Message-ID: d8811220-9ab4-21d8-2bf6-d815e7a74498@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 9/23/22 10:45 PM, Andres Freund wrote:

>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> On 2022-09-01 08:40:54 +0200, Drouvot, Bertrand wrote:
>> Thanks for the suggestion, I'm coming up with this proposal in v4 attached:
>
> I pushed the bugfix / related test portion to 15, master. Thanks!

Thanks!

>
> I left the replication stuff out - it seemed somewhat independent.

Yeah.

> Probably
> will just push that to master, unless somebody thinks it should be in both?

Sounds good to me as this is not a bug and that seems unlikely to me
that an issue in this area will be introduced later on on 15 without
being introduced on master too.

Regards,

--
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com 2022-09-26 08:27:55 RE: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply
Previous Message John Naylor 2022-09-26 08:18:29 Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson - v13