Re: pg_stat_have_stats() returns true for dropped indexes (or for index creation transaction rolled back)

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bdrouvot(at)amazon(dot)com>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_stat_have_stats() returns true for dropped indexes (or for index creation transaction rolled back)
Date: 2022-09-23 20:45:09
Message-ID: 20220923204509.uez54vl2rjlz47vh@awork3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2022-09-01 08:40:54 +0200, Drouvot, Bertrand wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestion, I'm coming up with this proposal in v4 attached:

I pushed the bugfix / related test portion to 15, master. Thanks!

I left the replication stuff out - it seemed somewhat independent. Probably
will just push that to master, unless somebody thinks it should be in both?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonathan S. Katz 2022-09-23 21:07:38 Re: First draft of the PG 15 release notes
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2022-09-23 20:31:03 Re: libpq error message refactoring