From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: annoyance with .git-blame-ignore-revs |
Date: | 2022-08-05 14:07:00 |
Message-ID: | d8553ef6-fdb6-e84e-895f-96a59af4fa5d@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2022-08-04 Th 20:35, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 12:30 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
>> $ git blame configure
>> fatal: could not open object name list: .git-blame-ignore-revs
>>
>> My first workaround was to add empty .git-blame-ignore-revs in all
>> checkouts. This was moderately ok (shrug), until after a recent `tig`
>> upgrade the empty file started to show up in the history as an untracked
>> file.
> Ping? Would be nice to get this done soon. I don't think that it
> requires a great deal of care. If I was doing this myself, I would
> probably make sure that the backbranch copies of the file won't
> reference commits from later releases. But even that probably doesn't
> matter; just backpatching the file from HEAD as-is wouldn't break
> anybody's workflow.
>
> Again, to reiterate: I see no reason to do anything on the
> backbranches here more than once.
>
> I mentioned already that somebody proposed a patch that fixes the
> problem at the git level, which seems to have stalled. Here is the
> discussion:
>
> https://public-inbox.org/git/xmqq5ywehb69(dot)fsf(at)gitster(dot)g/T/
>
> ISTM that we're working around what is actually a usability problem
> with git (imagine that!). I think that that's fine. Just thought that
> it was worth acknowledging it as such. We're certainly not the first
> people to run into this exact annoyance.
let's just backpatch the file and be done with it.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2022-08-05 14:17:13 | Re: annoyance with .git-blame-ignore-revs |
Previous Message | Melih Mutlu | 2022-08-05 13:55:09 | Re: [PATCH] Reuse Workers and Replication Slots during Logical Replication |