Re: trying again to get incremental backup

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: trying again to get incremental backup
Date: 2023-10-26 10:59:00
Message-ID: d3c7ad1d-6fe3-7d27-136a-bc3b552c49c0@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 2023-10-25 We 15:19, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 3:17 PM Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>> OK, I'll go with that. It will actually be a bit less invasive than the
>> patch I posted.
> Why's that?
>

Because we won't be removing the RD parser.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii.Yuki@df.MitsubishiElectric.co.jp 2023-10-26 11:11:09 RE: Partial aggregates pushdown
Previous Message Andrei Zubkov 2023-10-26 10:41:47 Re: [PATCH] Tracking statements entry timestamp in pg_stat_statements