Re: trying again to get incremental backup

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: trying again to get incremental backup
Date: 2023-10-25 19:19:59
Message-ID: CA+TgmoawtXFwmLbV4Gs56_F+CMTyo-gOW1uDhcQF8n8RPTXCwQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 3:17 PM Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> OK, I'll go with that. It will actually be a bit less invasive than the
> patch I posted.

Why's that?

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2023-10-25 19:43:44 Re: Making aggregate deserialization (and WAL receive) functions slightly faster
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2023-10-25 19:17:35 Re: trying again to get incremental backup