Re: Re: Row Level Security − leakproof-ness and performance implications

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Pierre Ducroquet <p(dot)psql(at)pinaraf(dot)info>
Cc: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: Row Level Security − leakproof-ness and performance implications
Date: 2019-03-29 11:09:39
Message-ID: d0c578dd-3b50-1cc2-400c-b8940167f366@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Pierre,

On 3/18/19 8:13 PM, Joe Conway wrote:
>
> I have no idea what the other entry is all about as I have not had the
> time to look.

There doesn't seem to be consensus on your patch, either -- I'm planning
to mark it rejected at the end of the CF unless you have a new patch for
consideration.

This thread got a bit hijacked and is hard to follow. If you do submit
a new patch I recommend creating a new thread.

Regards,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2019-03-29 11:13:23 Re: pg_ctl on windows can't open postmaster.pid: Permission denied
Previous Message David Steele 2019-03-29 10:38:55 Re: Re: log bind parameter values on error