Re: Speed in V8.0

From: "Thomas Wegner" <tomaten(at)t-online(dot)de>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Speed in V8.0
Date: 2004-12-22 00:25:45
Message-ID: cqaeu6$1pah$1@news.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

2. Develop Machine
- P4 1800MHz
- 760 MB RAM
- W2K
- PostgreSQL 8.0 RC2 Native Windows
- local connection 100MB/FD
---------------------------------------------
Thomas Wegner
CabrioMeter - The Weather Plugin for Trillian
http://www.wegner24.de/cabriometer

"Thomas Wegner" <tomaten(at)t-online(dot)de> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:cqaa3l$12im$2(at)news(dot)hub(dot)org(dot)(dot)(dot)
> Hello, i have a problem between V7.4.3 Cygwin and
> V8.0RC2 W2K. I have 2 systems:
>
> 1. Production Machine
> - Dual P4 3000MHz
> - 2 GB RAM
> - W2K
> - PostgreSQL 7.4.3 under Cygwin
> - i connect to it over a DSL Line
> 2. Develop Machine
> - P4 1800MHz
> - 760 MB RAM
> - PostgreSQL Native Windows
> - local connection 100MB/FD
>
> Both systems use the default postgresql.conf. Now the problem.
> I have an (unoptimized, dynamic) query wich was execute on the
> production machine over DSL in 2 seconds and on my develop
> machine, connected over local LAN, in 119 seconds!
>
> Whats this? I can not post the query details here public, its a commercial
> project. Any first idea? I execute on both machine the same query with
> the same database design!
> ---------------------------------------------
> Thomas Wegner
> CabrioMeter - The Weather Plugin for Trillian
> http://www.wegner24.de/cabriometer
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stacy White 2004-12-22 01:41:39 Re: Partitioned table performance
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2004-12-21 23:11:55 Re: Partitioned table performance