In article <spampit-3A2F1E(dot)20451409112004(at)host170(dot)octanews(dot)net>,
Klaas <spampit(at)klaas(dot)ca> wrote:
>In article <2vcp1nF2k0ftbU1(at)uni-berlin(dot)de>,
> Mike Cox <mikecoxlinux(at)yahoo(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> comp.databases.postgresql.general
>
>How about just comp.databases.postgresql or (shudder)
>comp.databases.postgresql.misc?
The whole point of this proposal is that c.d.p.general *already* exists in
an unofficial sense on some servers, and that it should be made
"official." Creating a new group with a different name will simply
confuse matters on those servers that already carry c.d.p.general.
--
Jon Bell <jtbellm4h(at)presby(dot)edu> Presbyterian College
Dept. of Physics and Computer Science Clinton, South Carolina USA