Re: I'm about to release the next postgresql RFD. Comments wanted.

From: Russ Allbery <rra(at)stanford(dot)edu>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: I'm about to release the next postgresql RFD. Comments wanted.
Date: 2004-11-10 04:46:46
Message-ID: 87ekj2ia4p.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

In news.groups, Klaas <spampit(at)klaas(dot)ca> writes:
> Mike Cox <mikecoxlinux(at)yahoo(dot)com> wrote:

>> comp.databases.postgresql.general

> How about just comp.databases.postgresql or (shudder)
> comp.databases.postgresql.misc?

In this particular situation, I think .general may actually be a better
name than either of those (not to mention matching the name of the mailing
list, as I recall). I know there's only one other .general group in the
Big Eight, but there are oodles of prior examples in other hierarchies.

--
Russ Allbery (rra(at)stanford(dot)edu) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jon Bell 2004-11-10 04:51:31 Re: I'm about to release the next postgresql RFD. Comments wanted.
Previous Message Klaas 2004-11-10 04:45:15 Re: I'm about to release the next postgresql RFD. Comments wanted.