Re: pg_hba.conf.sample wording improvement

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_hba.conf.sample wording improvement
Date: 2021-04-29 05:07:54
Message-ID: cec26985-cdff-1590-8343-b8b06a192b8f@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 28.04.21 16:09, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Looking at it now, I wonder how well do the "hostno" options work. If I
> say "hostnogssenc", is an SSL-encrypted socket good? If I say
> "hostnossl", is a GSS-encrypted socket good? If so, how does that make
> sense?

I think for example if you want to enforce SSL connections, then writing
"hostnossl ... reject" would be sensible. That would also reject
GSS-encrypted connections, but that would be what you want in that scenario.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2021-04-29 05:14:14 Re: Unresolved repliaction hang and stop problem.
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2021-04-29 05:07:00 Re: Replication slot stats misgivings