Re: Assertion failure in REL9_5_STABLE

From: Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Assertion failure in REL9_5_STABLE
Date: 2016-08-11 09:01:18
Message-ID: cd109b54-6c5a-b3f2-a440-c38d9be07c4d@joh.to
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/08/16 8:48 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 8:09 AM, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to> wrote:
>> On 2016-08-11 12:09 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>>
>>> BTW this is not a regression, right? It's been broken all along. Or am
>>> I mistaken?
>>
>> You're probably right. I just hadn't realized I could run our app against
>> 9.5 with --enable-cassert until last week.
>
> Just wondering... If you revert 1f9534b4 and/or b33e81cb do you still
> see a problem?

Yeah, no effect.

.m

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Palle Girgensohn 2016-08-11 09:15:36 Re: Improved ICU patch - WAS: Implementing full UTF-8 support (aka supporting 0x00)
Previous Message Vladimir Sitnikov 2016-08-11 08:39:05 Re: Slowness of extended protocol