Re: Assertion failure in REL9_5_STABLE

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Assertion failure in REL9_5_STABLE
Date: 2016-08-16 16:27:46
Message-ID: 20160816162746.d4grlsdfihs6nxmg@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2016-08-11 11:01:18 +0200, Marko Tiikkaja wrote:
> On 11/08/16 8:48 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 8:09 AM, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to> wrote:
> > > On 2016-08-11 12:09 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > > >
> > > > BTW this is not a regression, right? It's been broken all along. Or am
> > > > I mistaken?
> > >
> > > You're probably right. I just hadn't realized I could run our app against
> > > 9.5 with --enable-cassert until last week.
> >
> > Just wondering... If you revert 1f9534b4 and/or b33e81cb do you still
> > see a problem?
>
> Yeah, no effect.

Phew. Alvaro, are you tackling this?

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-08-16 16:33:40 Re: [GENERAL] C++ port of Postgres
Previous Message Yury Zhuravlev 2016-08-16 16:23:11 Re: [GENERAL] C++ port of Postgres