From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Nondeterministic collations vs. text_pattern_ops |
Date: | 2019-09-21 21:11:58 |
Message-ID: | ccf39dbc-cf05-1318-f466-0918cddbc23b@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2019-09-21 22:30, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
>> Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>>>> Here is a draft patch.
>
>> Where are we on pushing that? I'm starting to get antsy about the
>> amount of time remaining before rc1. It's a low-risk fix, but still,
>> it'd be best to have a complete buildfarm cycle on it before Monday's
>> wrap.
>
> Since time is now really running short, I went ahead and pushed
> this, after doing a closer review and finding one nitpicky bug.
Great! I think that covers all the open issues then.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2019-09-21 22:03:26 | Re: Avoiding possible future conformance headaches in JSON work |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2019-09-21 20:30:44 | Re: Nondeterministic collations vs. text_pattern_ops |