Re: Nondeterministic collations vs. text_pattern_ops

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Nondeterministic collations vs. text_pattern_ops
Date: 2019-09-21 21:11:58
Message-ID: ccf39dbc-cf05-1318-f466-0918cddbc23b@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019-09-21 22:30, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
>> Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>>>> Here is a draft patch.
>
>> Where are we on pushing that? I'm starting to get antsy about the
>> amount of time remaining before rc1. It's a low-risk fix, but still,
>> it'd be best to have a complete buildfarm cycle on it before Monday's
>> wrap.
>
> Since time is now really running short, I went ahead and pushed
> this, after doing a closer review and finding one nitpicky bug.

Great! I think that covers all the open issues then.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-09-21 22:03:26 Re: Avoiding possible future conformance headaches in JSON work
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-09-21 20:30:44 Re: Nondeterministic collations vs. text_pattern_ops