Re: Nondeterministic collations vs. text_pattern_ops

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Nondeterministic collations vs. text_pattern_ops
Date: 2019-09-21 20:30:44
Message-ID: 17800.1569097844@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>>> Here is a draft patch.

> Where are we on pushing that? I'm starting to get antsy about the
> amount of time remaining before rc1. It's a low-risk fix, but still,
> it'd be best to have a complete buildfarm cycle on it before Monday's
> wrap.

Since time is now really running short, I went ahead and pushed
this, after doing a closer review and finding one nitpicky bug.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2019-09-21 21:11:58 Re: Nondeterministic collations vs. text_pattern_ops
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-09-21 19:26:04 Re: some PostgreSQL 12 release notes comments