Re: pgsql: Disk-based Hash Aggregation.

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jeff Davis <jdavis(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Disk-based Hash Aggregation.
Date: 2020-03-23 21:49:29
Message-ID: cb724c2fb6d78d0b1d5df699f7e2f9f8a509b4d6.camel@j-davis.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 2020-03-23 at 02:05 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> If there's no way to test the feature in some significantly-cheaper
> way,
> perhaps we should move this test out to a separate script that's not
> run
> by default.

I'll rework the tests. I wanted to be a bit more aggressive about
testing right after the checkin to shake out any problems, but I don't
think that's necessary any more.

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-03-23 21:58:00 Re: pgsql: Disk-based Hash Aggregation.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-03-23 16:42:33 pgsql: Doc: explain that LIKE et al can be used in ANY (sub-select) etc

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-03-23 21:57:28 Re: Missing errcode() in ereport
Previous Message Justin Pryzby 2020-03-23 21:47:04 Re: ALTER INDEX fails on partitioned index