Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys

From: "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com, tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Rahila Syed <rahila(dot)syed(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys
Date: 2022-12-16 17:24:19
Message-ID: caf5f5cb-b3cc-96ec-013f-cfabba2bdc5b@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 12/16/22 5:38 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 10:08 AM Drouvot, Bertrand
> <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> After 1489b1ce728 the name mayConflictInLogicalDecoding seems odd. Seems
>>> it should be a riff on snapshotConflictHorizon?
>>
>> Gotcha, what about logicalSnapshotConflictThreat?
>
> logicalConflictPossible? checkDecodingConflict?
>
> I think we should try to keep this to three words if we can. There's
> not likely to be enough value in a fourth word to make up for the
> downside of being more verbose.
>

Yeah agree, I'd vote for logicalConflictPossible then.

Regards,

--
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2022-12-16 17:43:31 Re: pg_upgrade: Make testing different transfer modes easier
Previous Message Robert Haas 2022-12-16 16:38:33 Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys