Re: partition tree inspection functions

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeevan Ladhe <jeevan(dot)ladhe(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: partition tree inspection functions
Date: 2018-10-05 06:31:49
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2018/10/05 14:56, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 05:18:07PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> So it seems that I am clearly outvoted here ;)
>> Okay, let's do as you folks propose.
> And attached is a newer version with this isleaf stuff and the previous
> feedback from Amit integrated, as long as I recall about it. The
> version is indented, and tutti-quanti. Does that look fine to everybody
> here?

Thanks for making those changes yourself and posting the new version.

Can you check the attached diff file for some updates to the documentation
part of the patch. Other parts look fine.


Attachment Content-Type Size
doc-fixes.diff text/plain 1.5 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2018-10-05 06:35:04 Re: pgsql: Improve autovacuum logging for aggressive and anti-wraparound ru
Previous Message Amit Langote 2018-10-05 06:06:52 Re: pg_upgrade failed with ERROR: null relpartbound for relation 18159 error.