Re: partition tree inspection functions

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeevan Ladhe <jeevan(dot)ladhe(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: partition tree inspection functions
Date: 2018-10-05 05:56:41
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 05:18:07PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> So it seems that I am clearly outvoted here ;)
> Okay, let's do as you folks propose.

And attached is a newer version with this isleaf stuff and the previous
feedback from Amit integrated, as long as I recall about it. The
version is indented, and tutti-quanti. Does that look fine to everybody

The CF bot should normally pick up this patch, the previous garbage seen
in one of the tests seems to come from the previous implementation which
used strings...

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Add-pg_partition_tree-to-display-information-about-p.patch text/x-diff 15.2 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2018-10-05 06:05:43 Re: partition tree inspection functions
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2018-10-05 05:21:42 Re: pgsql: Improve autovacuum logging for aggressive and anti-wraparound ru