| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs |
| Date: | 2019-02-14 15:22:13 |
| Message-ID: | c94d0ddb-d7f8-84be-46a2-8eb569561948@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 14/02/2019 16:11, Tom Lane wrote:
> ... so, have we beaten this topic to death yet? Can we make a decision?
>
> Personally, I'd be happy with either of the last two patch versions
> I posted (that is, either AS [[NOT] MATERIALIZED] or
> AS [MATERIALIZE [ON|OFF]] syntax). But we gotta pick something.
If we're not really planning to add any more options, I'd register a
light vote for MATERIALIZED. It reads easier, seems more grammatically
correct, and uses an existing word.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2019-02-14 15:22:43 | Re: COPY support for parameters |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2019-02-14 15:16:05 | Re: WAL insert delay settings |