| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs |
| Date: | 2019-02-14 16:02:09 |
| Message-ID: | 20190214160209.GA13250@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2019-Feb-14, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 14/02/2019 16:11, Tom Lane wrote:
> > ... so, have we beaten this topic to death yet? Can we make a decision?
> >
> > Personally, I'd be happy with either of the last two patch versions
> > I posted (that is, either AS [[NOT] MATERIALIZED] or
> > AS [MATERIALIZE [ON|OFF]] syntax). But we gotta pick something.
>
> If we're not really planning to add any more options, I'd register a
> light vote for MATERIALIZED. It reads easier, seems more grammatically
> correct, and uses an existing word.
+1 for MATERIALIZED, as I proposed in
https://postgr.es/m/20170503173305.fetj4tz7kd56tjlr@alvherre.pgsql
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2019-02-14 16:02:24 | Re: WAL insert delay settings |
| Previous Message | John Naylor | 2019-02-14 16:01:35 | Re: Why don't we have a small reserved OID range for patch revisions? |