Re: Fix handling of unlogged tables in FOR ALL TABLES publications

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Fix handling of unlogged tables in FOR ALL TABLES publications
Date: 2019-04-18 08:14:04
Message-ID: c9244e08-5d9b-8a99-a8ea-32676466729c@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019-03-25 09:04, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> So perhaps push the check down to GetRelationPublicationActions()
> instead. That way we don't have to patch up two places and everything
> "just works" even for possible other callers. See attached patch.

This has been committed and backpatched to PG10.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Naylor 2019-04-18 08:40:06 Re: Unhappy about API changes in the no-fsm-for-small-rels patch
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2019-04-18 06:48:41 Re: Unhappy about API changes in the no-fsm-for-small-rels patch