Re: [HACKERS] Subscription code improvements

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Subscription code improvements
Date: 2018-01-26 02:41:25
Message-ID: c7779059-3b6a-4eca-a433-ee50c3b51917@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 1/24/18 02:33, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> Thank you for notification. Since it seems to me that no one is
> interested in this patch, it would be better to close out this patch.
> This patch is a refactoring patch but subscription code seems to work
> fine so far. If a problem appears around subscriptions, I might
> propose it again.

I have looked at the patches again. They seem generally reasonable, but
I don't see quite why we want or need them. More details would help
review them. Do they fix any bugs, or are they just rearranging code?

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2018-01-26 02:44:53 Re: [PATCH] Logical decoding of TRUNCATE
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2018-01-26 02:36:09 Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH]make pg_rewind to not copy useless WAL files