Re: RFC: Additional Directory for Extensions

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
To: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>
Cc: Matheus Alcantara <matheusssilv97(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RFC: Additional Directory for Extensions
Date: 2025-05-01 11:50:37
Message-ID: c6944eb3-c00f-413a-8c21-5baa7f81661e@eisentraut.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 28.04.25 23:14, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> On Apr 25, 2025, at 15:23, David E. Wheeler <david(at)justatheory(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Thank you for the review. Here’s v3*.
>
> V4 removes “/extension” from the end of the `extension_control_path` value.

The documentation in config.sgml says:

Note that the path elements should typically end in
<literal>extension</literal> if the normal installation layouts are
followed.

So I think your change here between v3 and v4 is incorrect.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2025-05-01 12:11:41 Re: Some problems regarding the self-join elimination code
Previous Message Junwang Zhao 2025-05-01 10:34:37 Re: Introduce some randomness to autovacuum