Re: RFC: Additional Directory for Extensions

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
Cc: Matheus Alcantara <matheusssilv97(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RFC: Additional Directory for Extensions
Date: 2025-05-01 14:31:28
Message-ID: 1C342F0D-2AAB-4C5D-A73A-351B8D59B641@justatheory.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On May 1, 2025, at 07:50, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:

> The documentation in config.sgml says:
>
> Note that the path elements should typically end in
> <literal>extension</literal> if the normal installation layouts are
> followed.
>
> So I think your change here between v3 and v4 is incorrect.

Right, sorry, forgot about that, I updated it in anticipation of Matheus’s patch[1] being committed.

So v3 is fine for now, but if that patch is committed, we’ll need to reconcile those docs.

Best,

David

[1]: https://postgr.es/m/CAFY6G8dUXHRii5rNy7V8WmBrmBwp9W7y3g+HL6Tn-Lu8KkvK=A@mail.gmail.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2025-05-01 14:32:36 Re: not not - pgupgrade.sgml
Previous Message Tom Lane 2025-05-01 14:19:06 Re: Performance issues with v18 SQL-language-function changes