| From: | Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: meson: Non-feature feature options |
| Date: | 2023-02-14 13:52:46 |
| Message-ID: | c649abc4-8ede-dba2-1a28-e6ee3cf35006@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2/8/23 19:23, Andres Freund wrote:
>> For the 'uuid' option, I'm not sure what the best way to address this would.
>> We could establish a search order of libraries that is used if no specific
>> one is set (similar to libreadline, libedit, in a way). So we'd have one
>> option 'uuid' that is of type feature with default 'auto' and another
>> option, say, 'uuid-library' of type 'combo'.
> Or add 'auto' as a combo option, and handle the value of the auto_features
> option ourselves?
If we do it like this, meson's --auto-features option won't work for
uuid. Is this something we want to consider?
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kyzer Davis (kydavis) | 2023-02-14 14:13:43 | RE: UUID v7 |
| Previous Message | Pradeep Kumar | 2023-02-14 13:39:49 | Extensible Rmgr for Table Ams |