| From: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Matsumura, Ryo" <matsumura(dot)ryo(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PROPOSAL]a new data type 'bytea' for ECPG |
| Date: | 2018-12-05 11:24:28 |
| Message-ID: | c6267d6b5c81f3b2b175b980c67cbe75e6cc709b.camel@postgresql.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Matsumura-san,
> Sorry to bother you, but I hope any comment of yours.
It is no bother.
I'm fine with the patch if it does not work against the standard.
I do think, though, we should change the debug output for
ecpg_free_params(). The way it is now it prints binary values which we
also have in our test suite. I'm afraid this will come back to haunt
us.
> > The patch does not support ECPG.bytea in sqltype of "struct
> > sqlvar_struct"
> > because of compatibility.
Sorry I do not really understand what you mean. Could you please
explain?
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
Jabber: michael at xmpp dot meskes dot org
VfL Borussia! Força Barça! SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alexey Bashtanov | 2018-12-05 11:42:54 | Re: proposal: plpgsql pragma statement |
| Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2018-12-05 08:59:07 | Re: don't mark indexes invalid unnecessarily |