RE: [PROPOSAL]a new data type 'bytea' for ECPG

Meskes-san

Sorry to bother you, but I hope any comment of yours.

Regards
Ryo Matsumura

> Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL]a new data type 'bytea' for ECPG
>
> > From: Tsunakawa, Takayuki [mailto:tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com]
> >
> > I think the host variable data type that corresponds to the server-side bytea
> > should be bytea. As the following pages state or imply, it would be better
> > to create standard-compliant LOB types someday, and use the keyword BLOB
> in
> > ECPG for that type. The server-side data types should have the names BLOB,
> > CLOB and NCLOB. Those types should handle data larget than 1 GB and have
> the
> > locator feature defined in the SQL standard. Maybe we should also advanced
> > LOB features like Oracle's SecureFiles LOB and SQL Server's FileTables.
>
> Tsunakawa-san, thanks for your advice.
> I understand that C type definition of client-side bytea is not constrained
> by the standard BLOB.
>
> What should I do next?
> For now, I attach a patch that is removed noise(pgindent/typedef.list).
>
> P.S.
> The patch does not support ECPG.bytea in sqltype of "struct sqlvar_struct"
> because of compatibility.
>
> Regards
> Ryo Matsumura