| From: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Vish Penmetsa <vish(dot)penmetsa(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Christophe Pettus <christophe(dot)pettus(at)pgexperts(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, pgsql-advocacy(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSql and VMS operating System |
| Date: | 2025-01-24 23:49:11 |
| Message-ID: | c5569d71-a509-4d16-8441-9a4b17cb2e05@aklaver.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On 1/24/25 15:21, Vish Penmetsa wrote:
> I used to work in Ingres support and one of the things was teaching
> Architecture of Ingres( seminar so just theory without handson ) .Coming
> from a trainer( dong tech support training on site consulting etc)
> people might have seen as shallow my discussions about advanced features
> of VMS.
>
> I will try to start working on this and probably note the features which
> justify
> the port with some comparative findings) and see if that could get more
> people interested.
>
I think it would be more useful to establish first whether there are
existing users of VMS that would like to see a port of Postgres. What
you are proposing, trying to get people to adopt a new to them OS as way
to get a port is quite a hurdle.
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vish Penmetsa | 2025-01-26 02:36:24 | Re: PostgreSql and VMS operating System |
| Previous Message | Vish Penmetsa | 2025-01-24 23:21:31 | Re: PostgreSql and VMS operating System |