Re: Signed vs Unsigned (take 2) (src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c)

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
To: Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com>, Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Signed vs Unsigned (take 2) (src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c)
Date: 2021-09-11 03:21:22
Message-ID: c325bf61-d8f9-a496-35c7-c353d06031b4@oss.nttdata.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2021/07/23 20:07, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> Em sex., 23 de jul. de 2021 às 07:02, Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com <mailto:aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>> escreveu:
>
> Hi hackers,
>
> The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
> make installcheck-world:  tested, passed
> Implements feature:       tested, passed
> Spec compliant:           tested, passed
> Documentation:            tested, passed
>
> The patch was tested on MacOS against master `80ba4bb3`.
>
> The new status of this patch is: Ready for Committer
>
>
> The second patch seems fine too. I'm attaching both patches to trigger cfbot and to double-check them.
>
> Thanks Aleksander, for reviewing this.

I looked at these patches because they are marked as ready for committer.
They don't change any actual behavior, but look valid to me in term of coding.
Barring any objection, I will commit them.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dilip Kumar 2021-09-11 04:17:00 Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Previous Message Jaime Casanova 2021-09-11 01:50:17 Re: SQL:2011 application time