Re: ALTER COLLATION misses errcode

From: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Subject: Re: ALTER COLLATION misses errcode
Date: 2026-10-31 21:00:00
Message-ID: c3025db3-3b9d-45dd-af61-845839d73399@gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello Kirill and Tom,

30.10.2026 20:38, Kirill Reshke wrote:
> We do monitor our logs for XX00* error codes to check for data
> corruptions etc, so sql-reachable XX000 gives us a red alert.

31.10.2026 18:46, Tom Lane wrote:
> I think FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED is fine here. Let's not spend too
> much effort on the color of this bikeshed.

FWIW, I spotted 6 other bikesheds on the same street [1], maybe you would
to paint them all at once...

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/f2758799-b7c1-4baf-8593-8899802cf48c%40gmail.com

Best regards.
Alexander

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noboru Saito 2026-10-31 21:20:18 Increasing number of unnecessary blank lines in the documentation
Previous Message Tom Lane 2026-10-31 20:24:10 Re: Reject wholerow references where ColumnRef is forbidden