Re: Multi-language to be or not to be

From: "Jaime Casanova" <systemguards(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Adrian Maier" <adrian(dot)maier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Multi-language to be or not to be
Date: 2007-02-13 00:48:35
Message-ID: c2d9e70e0702121648m5696db07s93bf643b7727cc4a@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On 2/12/07, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> > Using po files is really easier when you don't have big pages or
> > documents. They are really useful for apps' translations and websites.
> > But they could be nightmare for things like manuals, books.
>
> Right, that's what I thought. BTW, I don't think the website currently
> has the infrastructure to translate the docs part ;-)
>
>

but Mario Gonzales and Alvaro Herrera has:
http://pgfoundry.org/projects/webtranslator

you can find the project actually in use in
http://l10n.postgresql.cl/es it is still in development but the
infraestructure is there

--
regards,
Jaime Casanova

"Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to
build bigger and better idiot-proof programs and the universe trying
to produce bigger and better idiots.
So far, the universe is winning."
Richard Cook

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tino Wildenhain 2007-02-13 06:03:07 Re: Multi-language to be or not to be
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2007-02-13 00:24:25 Re: Multi-language to be or not to be