From: | ProfiVPS Support <support(at)profivps(dot)hu> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Strange update behaviour |
Date: | 2023-06-23 06:56:17 |
Message-ID: | c220ef685f6cc0363cb20bd6c21f5277@profivps.hu |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Tom,
thank you.
Man, I feel stupid now. It's true: with reason :D I completely forgot
about those updates and was only concentrating on the end update,
because those previous updates should not even be there....
I've been banging my head for weeks again and again on this problem,
never once scrolled up... Even had a colleague to review it
Thank you very much! Im really grateful :)
Bests,
András
2023-06-23 03:56 időpontban Tom Lane ezt írta:
> ProfiVPS Support <support(at)profivps(dot)hu> writes:
>
>> I hope everything is there to enable testing.
>
> Thanks for sending a test case! But I think this is a logic bug
> in your function. There are several updates of app_devices in
> that function. Adding some "raise notice" commands to track the
> logic flow, I see that the given case results in
>
> # SELECT collectd_insert(CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
> 'DE:AD:A7:14:69:9210.123.4.12', 'ruckusphp', '', 'pstates_enabled',
> 'state', '{et}', '{0}', '{1}');
> NOTICE: first update happening
> NOTICE: fourth update happening
> collectd_insert
> -----------------
>
> (1 row)
>
> So it is first doing
>
> UPDATE app_devices SET device_state=1, device_changets=NOW(),
> device_updatets=NOW()
> WHERE device_id= dev_id;
>
> and then later doing the UPDATE you showed. But at that point,
> device_state is already 1 so neither of the device_alertstate or
> device_changets updates change the column's value. It's unobvious
> that the device_changets update is a no-op because the first
> UPDATE already set it to the same new value.
>
> regards, tom lane
---
Olcsó Virtuális szerver:
http://www.ProfiVPS.hu
Támogatás: Support(at)ProfiVPS(dot)hu
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Romain Carl | 2023-06-26 11:44:39 | Window functions: frame-adhering aggregate without ORDER BY clause |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2023-06-23 01:56:07 | Re: Strange update behaviour |