From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | ProfiVPS Support <support(at)profivps(dot)hu> |
Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Strange update behaviour |
Date: | 2023-06-23 01:56:07 |
Message-ID: | 4141157.1687485367@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
ProfiVPS Support <support(at)profivps(dot)hu> writes:
> I hope everything is there to enable testing.
Thanks for sending a test case! But I think this is a logic bug
in your function. There are several updates of app_devices in
that function. Adding some "raise notice" commands to track the
logic flow, I see that the given case results in
# SELECT collectd_insert(CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
'DE:AD:A7:14:69:9210.123.4.12', 'ruckusphp', '', 'pstates_enabled',
'state', '{et}', '{0}', '{1}');
NOTICE: first update happening
NOTICE: fourth update happening
collectd_insert
-----------------
(1 row)
So it is first doing
UPDATE app_devices SET device_state=1, device_changets=NOW(), device_updatets=NOW()
WHERE device_id= dev_id;
and then later doing the UPDATE you showed. But at that point,
device_state is already 1 so neither of the device_alertstate or
device_changets updates change the column's value. It's unobvious
that the device_changets update is a no-op because the first
UPDATE already set it to the same new value.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | ProfiVPS Support | 2023-06-23 06:56:17 | Re: Strange update behaviour |
Previous Message | ProfiVPS Support | 2023-06-22 23:07:21 | Re: Strange update behaviour |