Re: Non-decimal integer literals

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Non-decimal integer literals
Date: 2023-01-23 15:55:17
Message-ID: c1c6877b-4e5d-595e-37e1-af8150f09e57@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 13.01.23 11:01, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> So I'm feeling quite good about the end result -- I set out hoping not
> to make performance noticeably worse, but ended up making it
> significantly better.

This is great! How do you want to proceed? You also posted an updated
patch in the "underscores" thread and suggested some additional work
there. In which order should these be addressed, in your opinion?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2023-01-23 16:21:53 Re: Improve GetConfigOptionValues function
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2023-01-23 15:53:41 WARNING: outfuncs/readfuncs failed to produce an equal rewritten parse tree