| From: | Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: Non-decimal integer literals |
| Date: | 2023-01-23 16:22:35 |
| Message-ID: | CAEZATCX5bGgh6C=jHpzLBv1fSej9Ht=F8fVYm2Zow3-+oXJZgw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 23 Jan 2023 at 15:55, Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On 13.01.23 11:01, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> > So I'm feeling quite good about the end result -- I set out hoping not
> > to make performance noticeably worse, but ended up making it
> > significantly better.
>
> This is great! How do you want to proceed? You also posted an updated
> patch in the "underscores" thread and suggested some additional work
> there. In which order should these be addressed, in your opinion?
>
I think it makes most sense if I push 0001 now, and then merge 0002
into the underscores patch. I think at least one of the suggested
changes to the underscores patch required 0002 to work.
Regards,
Dean
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2023-01-23 16:31:44 | Re: WARNING: outfuncs/readfuncs failed to produce an equal rewritten parse tree |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2023-01-23 16:21:53 | Re: Improve GetConfigOptionValues function |