Re: bump minimum supported version of psql and pg_{dump,dumpall,upgrade} to v10

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: bump minimum supported version of psql and pg_{dump,dumpall,upgrade} to v10
Date: 2026-05-16 17:51:57
Message-ID: c183ac21-f18c-4b82-8368-a71a286da209@dunslane.net
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 2026-05-16 Sa 9:44 AM, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Sat, May 16, 2026 at 09:42:47AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>>> Have we made a definite decision on this? If so, I will push the
>>> buildfarm change I have ready for it, so when we pull the trigger we
>>> don't get breakage.
>> I think we've agreed to do this for v20. (I've not reviewed the
>> proposed patch, so that's not an endorsement of the patch details.)
>> Getting out ahead of that in the buildfarm would be a good thing.
> +1
>

OK, I have pushed that. See
<https://github.com/PGBuildFarm/client-code/commit/4c3ed0c37bbcaf427e61384bb351364ecae9b4d9>

crake will be immediately affected on HEAD. I'll make a new release when
we branch the tree.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Isaac Morland 2026-05-16 17:54:36 Re: Order of tables dumped by pg_dump
Previous Message Tom Lane 2026-05-16 17:25:29 Re: Order of tables dumped by pg_dump