Re: bump minimum supported version of psql and pg_{dump,dumpall,upgrade} to v10

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: bump minimum supported version of psql and pg_{dump,dumpall,upgrade} to v10
Date: 2026-05-16 13:44:17
Message-ID: agh0sZXJ-rd7Fgb4@nathan
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, May 16, 2026 at 09:42:47AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> Have we made a definite decision on this? If so, I will push the
>> buildfarm change I have ready for it, so when we pull the trigger we
>> don't get breakage.
>
> I think we've agreed to do this for v20. (I've not reviewed the
> proposed patch, so that's not an endorsement of the patch details.)
> Getting out ahead of that in the buildfarm would be a good thing.

+1

--
nathan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sami Imseih 2026-05-16 14:29:29 Re: Track skipped tables during autovacuum and autoanalyze
Previous Message Tom Lane 2026-05-16 13:42:47 Re: bump minimum supported version of psql and pg_{dump,dumpall,upgrade} to v10