Re: Inconsistencies Found in ja.po Files on REL_17_STABLE

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
To: Jillian Pierson <jillianeve6(at)icloud(dot)com>, pgsql-translators(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Inconsistencies Found in ja.po Files on REL_17_STABLE
Date: 2026-09-18 09:03:27
Message-ID: c003a212-277e-461e-8d79-5971d5cd98bf@eisentraut.org
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-translators

On 22.07.26 16:40, Jillian Pierson wrote:
> Hi PostgreSQL Translation Team,
>
> I hope you're doing well. I'm reaching out because I recently reviewed the Japanese translation files (ja.po) on the REL_17_STABLE branch and noticed a few inconsistencies that may need attention.
>
> These issues were originally identified by Yadav, Siddharth, and I confirmed them by comparing the translation entries with the current OSS source code.
>
> Here’s a quick summary:
>
> 1. An added message appears in src/bin/psql/po/ja.po, but the corresponding English msgid does not exist in the source code.
> 2. A message marked as deleted in the translation update commit is still present in the OSS source code.
> 3. A modified translation entry uses a different format than the English source message, which has not been updated.
>
> If helpful, I can provide the exact file paths and msgids involved. I’ve also heard there may be additional similar issues, so a broader consistency check might be worthwhile.
>
> Thanks so much for your time and for all the work you do maintaining these translations.

Hi,

These sound like issues that happen temporarily as the source code and
translations get updated separately and then get synced up and merged as
part of the normal workflow. If you could show specific examples, then
we can check if these are things that would go away eventually on their
own or if there are genuine gaps in the tooling and verification. Thanks.

In response to

Browse pgsql-translators by date

  From Date Subject
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2026-09-18 08:59:02 Re: psql translations at risk of being dropped for 19