From: | Sailesh Krishnamurthy <sailesh(at)cs(dot)berkeley(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: some more docbook help |
Date: | 2003-03-13 04:43:21 |
Message-ID: | bxyu1e7c1w6.fsf@datafix.CS.Berkeley.EDU |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Phew .. after some more struggling with docbook I think I finally
managed to get it working. Posting here to help other folks googling
through usenet archives.
My problem was that I had DOCBOOKSTYLE set to /usr/local/share/sgml -
the directory which contained the "catalog" file. However, inspite of
this environment variable, configure insisted on setting DOCBOOKSTYLE
to /usr/local/share/sgml/docbook31
I finally fixed it by creating a file
/usr/local/share/sgml/docbook31/catalog as:
CATALOG "../dsssl/catalog"
CATALOG "docbook.cat"
CATALOG "../docbook-dsssl-1.77/catalog"
This works fine thankfully.
Now I have another question - and this is probably incredibly stupid.
I want to generate the PostgreSQL documentation with some extra
add-ons (DDL and DML we have added for streaming data and continuous
long-running queries). I would like the add-ons to show in some
changed fashion - say perhaps in bright red to show that this is new,
not-yet-very-well-tested (:-) functionality specific to our system
(TelegraphCQ) and not part of the base PostgreSQL features.
How would I go about doing something like this in SGML ?
I understand the whole process of SGML documentation as separating
content from presentation. So I imagine I should surround our new
stuff with some kind of tag, that when used with an HTML (or other)
stylesheet generates appropriately changed documentation.
I hope I am on the right track ! Could somebody help me please ?
Many thanks !
--
Sailesh
http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~sailesh
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joe Conway | 2003-03-13 05:34:33 | Re: [HACKERS] SQL99 ARRAY support proposal |
Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2003-03-13 04:01:57 | Re: SQL99 ARRAY support proposal |