Re: pg_upgrade: Pass -j down to vacuumdb

From: Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com, "Jamison, Kirk" <k(dot)jamison(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade: Pass -j down to vacuumdb
Date: 2019-01-28 20:55:00
Message-ID: be5cd0aa-304f-1b9f-68b4-0c747c67f73b@redhat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 1/28/19 3:50 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Done, and v4 attached.
>
> I would drop the changes in pgupgrade.sgml. We don't need to explain
> what doesn't happen, when nobody before now ever thought that it would
> happen.
>
> Also, we don't need the versioning stuff. The new cluster in pg_upgrade
> is always of the current version, and we know what that one supports.
>

Done.

Best regards,
Jesper

Attachment Content-Type Size
v5_0001-Highlight-that-the-jobs-option-isn-t-passed-down-to-.patch text/x-patch 2.3 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2019-01-28 21:02:11 Re: Proposed refactoring of planner header files
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-01-28 20:50:22 Re: Proposed refactoring of planner header files