| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com, fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com |
| Cc: | "Jamison, Kirk" <k(dot)jamison(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade: Pass -j down to vacuumdb |
| Date: | 2019-01-28 20:50:20 |
| Message-ID: | e103a8a1-a6f1-5709-6ac6-95684fd5bff2@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 28/01/2019 17:47, Jesper Pedersen wrote:
> On 1/28/19 11:30 AM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
>> IMHO you should use long option name '--jobs' like others.
>>
>
> Thanks for your feedback !
>
> Done, and v4 attached.
I would drop the changes in pgupgrade.sgml. We don't need to explain
what doesn't happen, when nobody before now ever thought that it would
happen.
Also, we don't need the versioning stuff. The new cluster in pg_upgrade
is always of the current version, and we know what that one supports.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2019-01-28 20:50:22 | Re: Proposed refactoring of planner header files |
| Previous Message | Nishant, Fnu | 2019-01-28 20:47:04 | Re: possible deadlock: different lock ordering for heap pages |