Re: pgmemcache vs pgmemcached

Is there any documentation on this? PgFoundry doesn't appear to have any.

Thanks

Thom

2009/11/13 Valtonen, Hannu <hannu(dot)valtonen(at)f-secure(dot)com>

> On 11/13/09 5:26 AM, Juan Backson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I had a chat with Suzuki Hironobu (pgmemcached maintainer) earlier this
> year and we pretty much decided that pgmemcache was the way to go after
> which Suzuku wrote a large patch to make it also support libmemcached
> behaviors and earlier PostgreSQL's.
>
> So I'd recommend just going with pgmemcache.
>
> - Hannu
>
> ps. As a disclaimer, I'm the current pgmemcache maintainer, I've also cc'd
> Suzuki san.
>
>
> I'm the current maintainer of pgmemcache
>
>
> Hi,
>> Have anyone tried pgmemcache and pgmemcached?
>> What is the difference betweent he two? They are both non-persistent,
>> so I have difficult time deciding which one to use.
>> Any suggestion?
>> Thanks,
>> jb
>>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>