Re: SQL Property Graph Queries (SQL/PGQ)

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
To: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, assam258(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku(at)gmail(dot)com>, Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org>, Ajay Pal <ajay(dot)pal(dot)k(at)gmail(dot)com>, Imran Zaheer <imran(dot)zhir(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SQL Property Graph Queries (SQL/PGQ)
Date: 2026-03-16 12:43:29
Message-ID: bcf58f6e-d0bd-49f8-b074-e3ee69ef6567@eisentraut.org
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11.03.26 08:34, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> There are two new patches 0004 and 0005 in the attached patchset.

I have committed this, including the 0004 patch. Let's consider the
0005 patch separately.

The buildfarm shows some instability in the pg_upgrade test, because
labels are printed by pg_get_propgraphdef() in implementation-dependent
order. Attached is a quick patch to sort the labels before printing.
Check please.

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-WIP-Dump-labels-in-reproducible-order.patch text/plain 2.8 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2026-03-16 12:47:13 Re: Change copyObject() to use typeof_unqual
Previous Message Daniil Davydov 2026-03-16 12:33:49 Re: POC: Parallel processing of indexes in autovacuum