| From: | Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, assam258(at)gmail(dot)com, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku(at)gmail(dot)com>, Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org>, Ajay Pal <ajay(dot)pal(dot)k(at)gmail(dot)com>, Imran Zaheer <imran(dot)zhir(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: SQL Property Graph Queries (SQL/PGQ) |
| Date: | 2026-03-16 13:02:02 |
| Message-ID: | CALdSSPg5ncYHJvF3B0x+mDYLdiNZynXd=gsF3zxFRcHtK+zpgA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 16 Mar 2026 at 17:43, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:
>
> On 11.03.26 08:34, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> > There are two new patches 0004 and 0005 in the attached patchset.
>
> I have committed this, including the 0004 patch. Let's consider the
> 0005 patch separately.
>
> The buildfarm shows some instability in the pg_upgrade test, because
> labels are printed by pg_get_propgraphdef() in implementation-dependent
> order. Attached is a quick patch to sort the labels before printing.
> Check please.
Hi!
Do we need to keep relation lock until end of function
(table_close(pglrel, AccessShareLock);)? I'm not sure if list_sort is
interruptible.
--
Best regards,
Kirill Reshke
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2026-03-16 13:31:12 | Re: Exit walsender before confirming remote flush in logical replication |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2026-03-16 12:47:13 | Re: Change copyObject() to use typeof_unqual |