Re: GUC flags

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: GUC flags
Date: 2021-12-08 12:23:51
Message-ID: bcb0f2dd-41a3-8d31-af95-44dd981a6968@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 08.12.21 07:27, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> I saw that Tom updated it within the last 12 months, which I took to mean that
>> it was still being maintained. But I'm okay with removing it.
> Yes, I saw that as of bf8a662. With 42 incorrect reports, I still see
> more evidence with removing it. Before doing anything, let's wait for
> and gather some opinions. I am adding Bruce (as the original author)
> and Tom in CC as they are the ones who have updated this script the
> most in the last ~15 years.

I wasn't really aware of this script either. But I think it's a good
idea to have it. But only if it's run automatically as part of a test
suite run.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2021-12-08 13:10:59 Re: Optionally automatically disable logical replication subscriptions on error
Previous Message Ajin Cherian 2021-12-08 11:52:28 Re: row filtering for logical replication