| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: GUC flags |
| Date: | 2021-12-09 08:17:54 |
| Message-ID: | YbG7sp+2YEYgbY0D@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 01:23:51PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I wasn't really aware of this script either. But I think it's a good idea
> to have it. But only if it's run automatically as part of a test suite run.
Okay. If we do that, I am wondering whether it would be better to
rewrite this script in perl then, so as there is no need to worry
about the compatibility of grep. And also, it would make sense to
return a non-zero exit code if an incompatibility is found for the
automation part.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2021-12-09 08:42:56 | Re: Make pg_waldump report replication origin ID, LSN, and timestamp. |
| Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2021-12-09 08:16:57 | Re: stat() vs ERROR_DELETE_PENDING, round N + 1 |